Dismissed Director of Finance and Administration of the New Patriotic Party (NPP), Mr. Fred Opare Hammond is considering a legal suit against the Chairman of the Party, Mr. Paul Afoko, the General Secretary, Mr. Kwabena Agyepong and the party in general, over what he terms as wrongÂful removal from office and defamation of character.
Mr. Opare Hammond was asked by the party’s General Secretary and Chairman to proceed on a compulsory leave-a decision that has since been vehemently conÂtested by some top officers of the party as unconstituÂtional.
The leadership of the party, at a press conference, said Mr. Opare Hammond was relieved of his post for gross disobedience, financial impropriety and his involveÂment in a case of conflict of interest.
The legal and constituÂtional Committee of the party, in its advice to the matter, however, says the action of the leadership was â€œimproper” and has accordÂingly advised the General
Secretary of the party to reinÂstate Mr. Opare Hammond and render an apology to him.
But the General Secretary, in a response said the advice was “unsolicitedâ€ and one that should be treated with the greatest contempt it deserves, arguing that the decision to relieve Mr.Hammond of his position is purely an administrative one.
The man at the centre of the controversy, however, says the stance of the leaderÂship of the party gives him a clear indication that the only language they would underÂstand is that which is spoken at the law court.
According to Hammond, he has exhausted all availÂable internal channels for seeking redress and is in talks with his lawyer to seek legal redress in court, to first clear his dented image and secondly compel the party leadership to do what is right.
Mr. Hammond, in an earÂlier interview with The Chronicle, emphasised that never in his four years workÂing period with the party was he ever involved in any financial impropriety, as sugÂgested by the party’s leaderÂship.
According to Mr. Hammond, in any good administrative setup, the partyâ€™s General Secretary and Chairman would have thorÂoughly investigated the matÂter, and even called him for clarification of issues, before going public with the falseÂhood.
Mr. Hammond noted that had the judgment of the new executives not been clouded with malice, they would have easily verified all the issues, before going public with their accusations of financial impropriety.
He recounted late July, this year, after his attempted removal from office he appealed to the National Executive Committee, after which the Steering Committee, which looked into the matter, concluded that his dismissal was unconÂstitutional and illegal, and recommended that he be reinstated.
Furthermore, he said a three man sub-committee was constituted to bring finality to the issue and was just waiting for the leaderÂship to act accordingly, only to hear of his alleged finanÂcial impropriety.
According to Mr. Hammond, his reputation has been dented by the leaderÂship of the party and would go all lengths to clear his name.
Source: The Chronicle